Methodological Basis of Unemployment

Authors

  • Bekim Grainca Skopje Faculty of Economics, Republic of North Macedonia,University "Saint Cyril and Methodius "

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46291/IJOSPERvol9iss1pp163-183

Keywords:

Macroeconomic,Unemployment,Socio-Economic

Abstract

The main objective of any macroeconomic policy is to achieve a steady economic growth with a low unemployment rate. Unemployment is one of the main (if not the most important) socio-economic problem in the Balkans and some country in EU, Unemployment is the most drastic form of social inequality. Unemployment has serious consequences for social and economic stability. Unemployment, as a general socio-economic phenomenon, for a longer time, is present in all countries of the world, regardless of the level of development and their socio-economic adjustment. Currently, the goal of each country is to achieve a sustainable economic development, which requires the achievement of a steady economic growth. One of the prerequisites for economic growth is macroeconomic stability. Among the different opinions from different schools about macroeconomic stability, the main indicator of macroeconomic stability is economic growth and unemployment. In order to provide scientific work descriptions with elements of scientific classification in understanding the problem of unemployment with a parallel approach to employment policy, with this work scientific aims to analyze relevant indicators of unemployment, the phenomenon of social (insecurity) as the root cause of unemployment, and thus determine the correlation between unemployment and economic development on the one hand, while on the other hand it aims through classification to enable finding the cause of the phenomenon of unemployment. Regardless of the situation, basically all policies, including macroeconomic, infrastructure and other sectoral policies, have different social and distributional effects that need to be accurately understood and translated into fair, participatory, and non-discriminatory policies that ensure greater formal employment. and better, and thus ensures a higher level of security quality in securing livelihoods and increasing the income of the insurance system, social protection and for the promotion and realization of social inclusion.

Unemployment is one of the most difficult economic problems, as it creates an income deficit, a situation that results in inequalities and stratification in society. Sociological and economic studies emphasize that employment is not only the most important determinant of the position of people in every country, but is also important for creating meaning, income, social stability and quality of life and a condition for participation in social activity. Unemployment which in fact will be the focus in the elaboration of this paper, then the analysis of the types of unemployment, analyzing the main reasons for unemployment. The main policies, their impact on reducing high and persistent unemployment, and finally the link between unemployment and economic growth.

References

Layard, R. and Nickell, S.J. (1999) ‘Labour Market. Institutions and Economic Performance’, in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam NorthHolland, Vol. 3E, pp 3029-3084.

Wiman,R., Voipio,T. and Ylonen, M. (Ed.),(2006). The National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health.Comprehensive Social and Employment Polices for Development in a Globalizing World. Minstry for Foreign Affairs in co-operation with the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and STAKES,

Diamond, P., & Lodge, G. (2013). London: Policy Network, European welfare states after the crisis: Changing public attitudes, policy network paper.

Farnsworth, K., & Irving, Z. (2010). Varieties of crisis within variable capitalisms: Contemplating the implications of economic crisis for social policy. Paper presented at the Social Policy Association Annual Conference University of Lincoln, 5-7 July 2010.

Tsoulfidis, L. (2010),Competing schools of economic thought, Springer, Heidelberg.

Veselinovic,(2017),Unemployment and Policy Employment, Doctoral Dissertation Banja Luka,(2020), Drasko Gajic.

Ashton, D. (2017). Globalization and Its Impact on the Political, Economic, and Labor Market Aspects of the Transition. In I. Schoon & J. Bynner (Eds.), Young People's Development and the Great Recession: Uncertain Transitions and Precarious Futures (pp. 25-51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316779507.003.

Samuelson, P.A. i Nordhaus, W.D. (2007) Economy. Zagreb:

Mrnjavac, Zeljko, (1996) Measuring unemployment, Faculty of Economics Split, Rothbard, Murray (1963). Princeton: Van Nostrand,The American Great Depression.p. 45.

Anderton, Alain (2006). Economics (Fourth Edition). Ormskirk.

Wertheimer-Baletić, (1978) Economic activity of the population, Demographic aspect, Zagreb,pp. 27-28,

Bivens, Josh; Shierholz, Heidi, (2014), Unemployment, Remains So High, Economic policy institute. Lagging Demand, Not Unemployability, Is Why Long-Term,

Abraham, Katharine G., John Haltiwanger, Kristin Sandusky, and James R. Spletzer. (2013),” Journal of Labor Economics “Exploring Differences in Household vs. Establishment Measures of Employment”31(2, pt. 2), S129-S172.

Sarfati, H. (1999). The European Job Crisis and the role of the labour market flexibility and social dialogue. Geneva: ILO

Iacovou, M. (2017). Young People's Experiences of Employment and Unemployment Across Europe: Evidence from the EU- SILC. In I. Schoon & J. Bynner (Eds.), Young People's Development and the Great Recession: Uncertain Transitions and Precarious Futures (pp.103-128). Cambridge: Cambridge University

David N. F. Bell, David G. Blanchflower, (2011). Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Young people and the Great Recession,Volume 27, Issue 2, Summer 2011,Pages241– 267, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grr011

Anderson, C. (2001). In N.Bermeo (Ed.),Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Unemployment in New Europe (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics, pp. 271- 290). doi:10.1017 / CBO9780511664151.010.

Chapon and Euzéby, (2002), International Social Security Review “Towards a convergence of European social models?”,vol. 55, no. 2”

Sauer M., (2008), Theoretical introduction to labor market policy '', Vuković D., Arandarenko

M., Labor market and employment policy, Belgrade: Faculty of Political Science, Belgrade.

Krugman, P., Wells, R. (2006). Macroeconomics. New York: Worth Publishers. 29. Krugman,P.(2012). Revenge of the Optimum Currency Area. NBER Macroeconomics

Annual, 27 (2012), 439-448.https://doi.org/10.1086/669188

ECB (2012). Euro area labor markets and the crisis. Occasional Paper Series, no. 138, 69-80. Available at: HTTPs://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecbocp138.pdf? E31046a7c702c8fe89180e3b3e4bdb1b 17.

ECB (2016). The employment-GDP relationship since the crisis. ECB Economic Bulletin,53-71. Available at https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/ pdf / other /eb201606_article01.en.pdf.

A.Obadć (2003). The impact of active and passive policies on the labor market Financial Theory and Practice 27(4) p. 529-546.

Martin, J.P. (2000), OECD Publishing.What Works Among Active Labour Market Policies: Evidence from OECD Countries’Experiences, OECD Economic Studies 3,

Western, B., & Healy, K. (2001). Cambridge: Cambridge University, Press. doi: 10.1017/ CBO9780511664151.005, Wage Growth, Recession, And Labor Decline in The Industrialized Democracies, 1965–1993.

Published

2021-04-10

How to Cite

Grainca, B. (2021). Methodological Basis of Unemployment. International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research, 9(1), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.46291/IJOSPERvol9iss1pp163-183

Issue

Section

Articles