Attitudes Towards the Decision-Making Process in Rohingya Community Households


Abstract views: 28 / PDF downloads: 5

Authors

  • Md. Mamunur Rashid Senior Research Associate, EACR Services
  • Mahamudul Hassan Senior Research Associate, EACR Services
  • Nurul Islam Senior Research Associate, EACR Services

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17560512

Keywords:

Rohingya, Households, Decisions Making, Child Marriage, Health, Education

Abstract

The current state of the Rohingya community, economic and social status is still substantially inadequate. The research will describe both the decision-making thinking patterns and gender roles on everyday decisions within Rohingya society. The research employed mixed methods to obtain information from respondents. Apart from that this study received information supported by finding from UN Women and Action Against Hunger. The research study showed minimal involvement in communal choices concerning marriage arrangements as well as other child conception and children’s educational choices. Decisions in this case rest exclusively with male members of the society. Household decisions about healthcare access, having another child, marriage, earning, spending, migration and household affairs are managed by women alone according to 10% or fewer respondents. Research findings will create conditions for Rohingya community members to take part more actively in their decision-making process. Such findings are essential in researching context-sensitive humanitarian action that is inclusive by engaging women more in governance and by further strengthening resilience, as well as improving gender equity.

References

Action Against Hunger. (2019). Mitigating and preventing gender-based violence in the fight against hunger: A guide to adapted tools. Relief Web. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/mitigating-and-preventing-gender-based-violence-fight-against-hunger-guide-adapted

Action Against Hunger. (2021). Gender equality and gender-based violence. Retrieved July 12, 2021, from https://actionagainsthunger.ph/gender/

Amnesty International. (2024, August 24). Myanmar: New attacks against Rohingya a disturbing echo of 2017 mass violence. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/08/myanmar-new-attacks-against-rohingya-a-disturbing-echo-of-2017-mass-violence/

Bradley, S. E. K., & Tsui, A. O. (1997). Women's autonomy and reproductive health decision-making: Experience from the Philippines. International Family Planning Perspectives, 23(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950781

Ellsberg, M., & Heise, L. (2005). Researching violence against women: A practical guide for researchers and activists. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/42966

European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). (2014). Gender-based violence. Retrieved from https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-based-violence

Faısal, M. M., & Ullah, R. (2022). Challenges in a host country: A study on Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh. Middle East Journal of Refugee Studies, 6(2), 5-19. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mejrs/issue/69142/1055046

Freedman, J. (2016). Sexual and gender-based violence against refugee women: A hidden aspect of the refugee “crisis”. Reproductive Health Matters, 24(47), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.05.003

Hossain, M., Zimmerman, C., Kiss, L., Kone, D., Bakayoko-Topolska, M., Manan, D. K., ... & Watts, C. (2014). Working with men to prevent intimate partner violence in a conflict-affected setting: A pilot cluster randomized controlled trial in rural Côte d'Ivoire. BMC Public Health, 14, 339. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-339

Human Rights Watch. (2024). Rohingya. Retrieved April 8, 2025, from https://www.hrw.org/tag/rohingya

International Rescue Committee (IRC). (2018). Displacement and decision-making in Rohingya communities.

Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125

Krause, U. (2015). A continuum of violence? Linking sexual and gender-based violence during conflict, flight, and encampment. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance. http://sites.tufts.edu/jha/archives/2217

Naved, R. T., & Persson, L. A. (2010). Dowry and spousal physical violence against women in Bangladesh. Journal of Family Issues, 31(6), 830–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09357554

O'Neil, T., Plank, G., & Domingo, P. (2015). Support to women and girls’ leadership: A rapid review of the evidence. Overseas Development Institute. https://odi.org/en/publications/support-to-women-and-girls-leadership-a-rapid-review-of-the-evidence/

Schuler, S. R., & Nazneen, S. (2018). Does intimate partner violence decline as women’s empowerment becomes normative? Perspectives of Bangladeshi women. World Development, 101, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.08.005

UN Women. (2018). Gender dynamics in Rohingya refugee camps. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.

UNFPA. (2020). Gender-based violence and COVID-19: The complexities of working on GBV during a pandemic. United Nations Population Fund. https://www.unfpa.org/resources/gender-based-violence-and-covid-19

UNHCR. (2019). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2018. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/5d08d7ee7/unhcr-global-trends-2018.html

USAID. (2012). USAID strategy to prevent and respond to gender-based violence globally. U.S. Agency for International Development. https://www.usaid.gov/gbv-strategy

Downloads

Published

2025-08-15

How to Cite

Rashid, M. M., Hassan, M., & Islam, N. (2025). Attitudes Towards the Decision-Making Process in Rohingya Community Households. International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research, 12(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17560512

Issue

Section

Articles