The Protection of the Index of 35th Class About Retail Services Subgroup in the Classification of Marks

Authors

  • Deniz TOPCU Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Beykent Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Ticaret Hukuku ABD, deniztopcu@beykent.edu.tr

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46291/IJOSPERvol7iss4pp904-926

Keywords:

Trademark Law, Classification of Marks, Nice System, Retail Sales Service, Act of Selling Goods.

Abstract

The effect of classroom contents on brand protection in the Nice system causes intense discussion of the contents of the service classes, especially. While the 35th class as a service class is already a class whose content is trying to be concretized, the content of the services called "retail sales services" in the 35.05 subgroup has become more controversial after the changes after 2011. In particular, the classes placed in the content of the retail services sub-group constitute the focus of the debate on this issue. In this discussion, it is evaluated by different opinions whether the property classes registered in 35.05. In addition, the owners of registered trademarks in the goods classes, 35.05. Whether it can sell products with the same brand without registering its sub-group constitutes one of the conflicts in practice. In other words, the borderline of the concept of "retail sales services" with other classes is tried to be determined. Especially the meaning of "retail sales services" needs to be evaluated in determining this line.

References

Çolak, U. (2018). Türk marka hukuku (4.bs.). İstanbul: XII Levha.

Doğan, B.D. (2009). Perakende satış hizmeti(35.8) için marka tescilinde ortaya çıkan sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, s.11-31.

Gibbons, G.(2016). Trademarks law (second edition). UK: Clarus Press.

Kaya, A. (2006). Marka hukuku, İstanbul : Arıkan.

Kazancı Hukuk Otomasyon Sistemi, İçtihat ve Mevzuat Programları.

Paslı, A. ve Soykan, İ. C. (2011). Marka tescilinde 35.08. sınıfın anlamı ve kapsamı, Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Yıllığı, C.II, 2010, İstanbul : XII Levha, s.441-474.

Suluk, C. , Karasu, R. ve Nal, T. (2020). Fikri mülkiyet hukuku, Ankara : Seçkin.

Tekinalp, Ü. (2012). Fikri mülkiyet hukuku (gün. ve gen. 5. bs.), İstanbul : Vedat.

Ünsal, Ö. E. (2018). Ipr gezgini seçme yazılar-1, Ankara : Lykeion.

Ünsal, Ö. E. (19.01.2020). Bir 35 vardır bende benden içeri, (yararlanma tarihi 01.11.2020), (çevrimiçi) https://iprgezgini.org/2020/01/19/bir-35-vardir-bende-benden-iceri-adalet-divani-genel-mahkemesi-lloyd-karari-t-729-18/.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2001). International classification of good and services (eight edition, part II).

Yusufoğlu, F. (2018). Perakendecilik hizmeti sınıfı (35.05. sınıf) ile ürün sınıfı arasındaki ilişkilerin marka hukukundaki etkisi, Galatasaray Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (2018/1), s.335-385.

http://eur-lex. europa.eu

http://europa.eu

http://iprgezgini.org

http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr

http://www.turkpatent.gov.tr

http://www.wipo.int

Published

2020-12-23

How to Cite

TOPCU, D. (2020). The Protection of the Index of 35th Class About Retail Services Subgroup in the Classification of Marks. International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research, 7(4), 904-926. https://doi.org/10.46291/IJOSPERvol7iss4pp904-926

Issue

Section

Articles