Anchoring Effect as A Cognitive Bias: An Example of a Classroom Experiment

Authors

  • Mehmet SEVGIN University of Wroclaw, Ph.D. Student in Political and Administrative Sciences. sevgin.mehmet92@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0003-2167-6838

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46291/IJOSPERvol7iss3pp608-629

Keywords:

Anchoring Effect, Anchoring-and-Adjustment, Incidental Anchors, Experimental Economics

Abstract

Over the last decades, standard economic assumptions are questioned due to some empirical violation examples of the rationality principle in economic theory. Behavioral economists suggest that it is more realistic to call individuals and firms "bounded rational" than rational to solve this inconsistency. Hence, one of the primary sources of these rationalities comes from cognitive biases and heuristics, according to many psychologies and behavioral economics studies. It is assumed that anchoring effect is one of the most robust cognitive biases since it might occur without the individual's awareness. In this study, anchoring effect as a cognitive bias is analyzed with its theoretical and psychological background. In the last section of the study, the findings of a class experiment are presented and discussed. According to the results, when the anchoring effect increases, the anchors' impact on the mean estimations of the subjects also increases. Moreover, when the subjects are explicitly directed to the anchor value, anchoring effect is more influential than a regular incidental anchoring effect. Hence, increases in anchoring effect result in a larger influence on the estimations of the subjects.

References

Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. (2003). Coherent Arbitrariness: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73-106.

Camerer, C. (1999). Behavioral Economics: Reunifying Psychology and Economics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 10575-10577.

Camerer, C. F., and Loewenstein, G. (2003). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future.

Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 115-153 (as cited in Furnham, A., and Boo, H. C. (2011). A Literature Review of the Anchoring Effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 35-42).

Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.

Critcher, C. R., and Gilovich, T. (2008). Incidental Environmental Anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 241-251.

Druckman, J. N., and Kam, C. D. (2011). Students As Experimental Participants. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, 1, 41-57

Durlak, J. A. (2009). How to Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 917-928.

Ehrlinger J., Readinger W.O., Kim B., Decision-making and Cognitive Bias, ,,Encyclopedia of Mental Health”, 12, 2016.

Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391-396.

Furnham, A., and Boo, H. C. (2011). A Literature Review of the Anchoring Effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 35-42.

Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). First Offers as Anchors: The Role of Perspective-Taking and Negotiator Focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 657.

Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. New York: Academic Press (as cited in Durlak, J. A. (2009). How To Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 917-928).

Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161-1166.

Joireman, J., Truelove, H. B., and Duell, B. (2010). Effect of Outdoor Temperature, Heat primes and Anchoring on Belief in Global Warming. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 358-367.

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., Tversky. A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, 263-292.

Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the party line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences. Political Behavior, 27, 163-182 (as cited in Druckman, J. N., and Kam, C. D. (2011). Students As Experimental Participants. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, 1, 41-57.

Mussweiler, T., & Englich, B. (2005). Subliminal Anchoring: Judgmental Consequences and Underlying Mechanisms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98, 133-143.

Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000). Numeric Judgments Under Uncertainty: The Role of Knowledge in Anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 495-518.

Samuelson, W., and Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.

Sears, D. O. (1986). College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-529.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and Quasi-Causal Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (as cited in Druckman, J. N., and Kam, C. D. (2011). Students As Experimental Participants. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, 1, 41-57).

Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183-206.

Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.

Ünveren, B., and Baycar, K. (2019). Historical Evidence for Anchoring Bias: The 1875 Cadastral Survey in Istanbul. Journal of Economic Psychology, 73, 1-14.

Wansink, B., Kent, R. J., and Hoch, S. J. (1998). An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Purchase Quantity Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 71-81

Wilke A., Mata R., Cognitive Bias, ,,Academic Press”, 2012.

Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., and Brekke, N. (1996). A New Look at Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring and Its Antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 387.

Published

2020-09-03

How to Cite

SEVGIN, M. (2020). Anchoring Effect as A Cognitive Bias: An Example of a Classroom Experiment. International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research, 7(3), 608-629. https://doi.org/10.46291/IJOSPERvol7iss3pp608-629

Issue

Section

Articles