Unraveling Section 39 of the Contract Act 1872: A Pathway to Classifying Breaches?


Abstract views: 5 / PDF downloads: 4

Authors

  • Dalia Pervin Professor, Department of Law, University of Dhaka, dalia.pervin@yahoo.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18867724

Keywords:

Anticipatory Breach, Contract Act, Section 39

Abstract

Depending on when the repudiation happens, contractual breaches under common law occur as either actual breaches or anticipatory breaches. This article explores integrating the concept of anticipatory breach into the Contract Act 1872. Although not explicitly stated, it is argued that section 39 of the Act may contain elements aligning with anticipatory breach in the common law. This article aims to explain the concept of ‘anticipatory breach’ clearly, address potential misinterpretations of the section, and discuss its implications. In addition, the question of why acknowledging anticipatory breach is necessary is explored for its substantive and philosophical implications.

References

Books

Ablum, Brian (2017), Example & Explanations Contracts, Wolters Kluwer.

Beale. H.G. (Ed.) (1999), Chitty on Contracts, vol. 1, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.

Black, H. C., & Garner, B. A. (1999). Black’s Law Dictionary. West Publishing Company.

Burnham, S. J. (2012). Contract Law for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons.

Davies, P. S. (2021). JC Smith’s the Law of contract. Oxford University Press.

Pollock and Mulla (2001), Indian Contract and Specific Relief Acts, Butterworths.

Poole, J. (2012). Textbook on Contract Law. Oxford University Press.

Sahay, Rahul S (Ed.) (2014), Mulla: The Indian Contract Act, LexisNexis.

Singh, Dr. Avtar (2020), Law of Contract and Specific Relief, Eastern Book Company.

Statutes

The Contract Act, 1872

Uniform Commercial Code

Cases

Avery v. Bowden [1855] 119 E.R. 1122

Bettini v Gye [1876] 1 QBD 183

Bunge SA v Nidera BV [2015] UKSC 43, 3 All ER 1082 (12)

Fercometal v. Mediterranean Shipping [1989] AC 788

Foran v Wight [1989] 168 CLR 385

Frost v Knight (1872) LR 7 Ex 111, 41 LJEx 78

Hochster v. De la Tour(1853) 2 E & B 678

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co. Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26

Lombard North v Butterworth (1987) 1 QB 727

Raymond Weil, S.A. v. Theron 585 F. Supp. 2d 473 (S.D. N. Y. 2008

Roth and Cov. Taysen, Townsend, and Co. and Grant and Co, (1895) 73 L.T. 628

Schiller v Sooltan ILR [1878] 4 Cal 252

Vitol S.A. v Norelf Ltd.[1996] 3 WLR 105

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Pervin, D. (2026). Unraveling Section 39 of the Contract Act 1872: A Pathway to Classifying Breaches?. International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research, 13(01), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18867724

Issue

Section

Articles