Unraveling Section 39 of the Contract Act 1872: A Pathway to Classifying Breaches?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18867724Keywords:
Anticipatory Breach, Contract Act, Section 39Abstract
Depending on when the repudiation happens, contractual breaches under common law occur as either actual breaches or anticipatory breaches. This article explores integrating the concept of anticipatory breach into the Contract Act 1872. Although not explicitly stated, it is argued that section 39 of the Act may contain elements aligning with anticipatory breach in the common law. This article aims to explain the concept of ‘anticipatory breach’ clearly, address potential misinterpretations of the section, and discuss its implications. In addition, the question of why acknowledging anticipatory breach is necessary is explored for its substantive and philosophical implications.
References
Books
Ablum, Brian (2017), Example & Explanations Contracts, Wolters Kluwer.
Beale. H.G. (Ed.) (1999), Chitty on Contracts, vol. 1, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.
Black, H. C., & Garner, B. A. (1999). Black’s Law Dictionary. West Publishing Company.
Burnham, S. J. (2012). Contract Law for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
Davies, P. S. (2021). JC Smith’s the Law of contract. Oxford University Press.
Pollock and Mulla (2001), Indian Contract and Specific Relief Acts, Butterworths.
Poole, J. (2012). Textbook on Contract Law. Oxford University Press.
Sahay, Rahul S (Ed.) (2014), Mulla: The Indian Contract Act, LexisNexis.
Singh, Dr. Avtar (2020), Law of Contract and Specific Relief, Eastern Book Company.
Statutes
The Contract Act, 1872
Uniform Commercial Code
Cases
Avery v. Bowden [1855] 119 E.R. 1122
Bettini v Gye [1876] 1 QBD 183
Bunge SA v Nidera BV [2015] UKSC 43, 3 All ER 1082 (12)
Fercometal v. Mediterranean Shipping [1989] AC 788
Foran v Wight [1989] 168 CLR 385
Frost v Knight (1872) LR 7 Ex 111, 41 LJEx 78
Hochster v. De la Tour(1853) 2 E & B 678
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co. Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26
Lombard North v Butterworth (1987) 1 QB 727
Raymond Weil, S.A. v. Theron 585 F. Supp. 2d 473 (S.D. N. Y. 2008
Roth and Cov. Taysen, Townsend, and Co. and Grant and Co, (1895) 73 L.T. 628
Schiller v Sooltan ILR [1878] 4 Cal 252
Vitol S.A. v Norelf Ltd.[1996] 3 WLR 105
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
